Showing posts with label poll. Show all posts
Showing posts with label poll. Show all posts

08 December 2009

Post-Afghan Speech Job-Approval Polling

President Obama's polling numbers, following the speech on revisions to the Afghanistan policy, have continued on a downward trend. RCP noted that the Gallup poll had an unusual drop of four points overnight.
'Obama suffered a net four point loss of support overnight - a noticeably sharp decline for a tracking poll that usually doesn't move more than a point or two in either direction on any given day.'

Polling Data

PollDateSampleApprove Disapprove Spread
RCP Average11/12 - 12/6--49.045.1 +3.9
Gallup12/4 - 12/61547 A4746 +1
Rasmussen Reports12/4 - 12/61500 LV4950 -1
CNN/Opinion Research12/2 - 12/31041 A4850 -2
USA Today/Gallup11/20 - 11/221017 A5044 +6
FOX News11/17 - 11/18900 RV4646Tie
CBS News11/13 - 11/161167 A5336 +17
Democracy Corps (D)11/12 - 11/161000 RV5044 +6

See All President Obama Job Approval Polling Data

These polling changes are largely meaningless to the Presidency at this point in time, and similar results only forced President Clinton to re-tool his agenda, pushing him closer to the center than he might otherwise have been. To many in Congress, however, these numbers have got to be troubling. Harry Reid continues to sound increasingly desperate, while his own poll numbers have taken a long, slow dive. Generic Congressional polls place Republicans within 0.4 points of Democrats, while 58.2% (as an average of multiple polls) state that the country is headed in the wrong direction. In general, these are not the numbers to make the Democratic Party happy, and may signal a trend back toward the center.

03 November 2009

UPDATES: Final Results

FINAL UPDATES: Hoffman lost to Owens by 2%, conceding early this morning. Interestingly, some of the same folks who refused to support the local RNC nominee for Hoffman, now appear to be setting their sites on a number of races, including next year's race in FL for Senate. The very moderate/neutral governor, Charlie Crist, has been dominating the headlines and cashflow in that race, but Mark Rubio (a much more conservative candidate) has been gaining ground. This might become the next battlefield in the fight over the direction of the GOP.

As noted here last night, both the Virginia and New Jersey governorships were handily won by Republican candidates. Whether this was a rebuke to Washington or simply voter unhappiness with the economy, seems to be simply a matter of perspective. Democrats are distancing themselves as fast as possible from Deeds and Corzine (despite calling in the big guns to run for them, including multiple, personal appearances by the President), while conservatives (both independent and party-affiliated) are drawing clear conclusions that this was the shot across the bow for Obama and the Democratic-led Congress.

UPDATE 7: Hoffman is down by only 3% now - things are tightening back up. Fox News has called NJ for Christie as well.

UPDATE 6: Hoffman is down by 7% right now.

UPDATE 5: AP Mobile Updates is calling New Jersey for Christie! NJ turns red again. Here's why.

UPDATE 4: Nearly 70% of the precincts have reported in for NJ, and Christie is still up by 6%.

UPDATE 3: With 60% of NJ precincts reporting, Christie is maintaining a 6% lead over Corzine.

UPDATE 2: Right Pundit's is calling it for Hoffman over Owens in New York's 23d Congressional District. This give a victory not just to the GOP, but to the more conservative wing of the GOP which pushed for Hoffman as a candidate for the Conservative Party over the approved GOP candidate.

UPDATE 1: NJ.com and the Star -Ledger are reporting that with 58% of precincts reporting, Christie is up by 50% to Corzine's 44%. A big Republican sweep is looking possible.

The White House downplayed the possibility of a Republican sweep in three important races today: the governorships in Virginia and New Jersey and a traditionally Republican Congressional district in New York.
'"We don't look at either of the gubernatorial races or the congressional race as something that portends a lot for our legislative efforts going forward or our political prospects in 2010," White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said at his daily briefing.'
This would be more believable if it weren't for the near certainty that today's briefing would have attributed likely Democratic wins to the overwhelming success of President Obama's policies. The trouble for the White House is that they can't tout that success, so the next best option is to distance themselves from the very candidates that the President has been zealously promoting.

Current results put Bob McDonnell (R) as handily winning the Virginia governor's race by 60%+ to 35%+, far larger than the predicted margin of victory. The latest exit polling has no clear winner for either New Jersey or the 23d district in New York. Exit polling in NJ indicate little influence by President Obama on voter decision-making, and the results in generally blue state will probably be very attributed to the party with the best voter turnout. Currently, Christie (R-challenger) is leading in the exit polls, but with only .003% of polls reporting. Clearly it's going to be a long night in New Jersey. Meanwhile, Hoffman (C) appears on track to win the 23 Congressional district in New York over Owens (D), despite a very late endorsement by the GOP following the withdrawal of the approved Republican candidate, Scozzafava (who subsequently endorsed Owens).

Regardless of the final results, tonight's results will most likely result from a combination of voter dissatisfaction with the administration policies as well as general discontent with the economy (particularly the jobs and property markets). If all three races swing conservative, then it seems likely that a message is being sent. Whether that message is a general cry for help or a cry of anger against the President remains to be seen.

30 August 2009

What a Charmer!

The opinion pages of the Las Vegas Review Journal bring us this little gem:
'On Wednesday, before he addressed a Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce luncheon, Reid joined the chamber's board members for a meet-'n'-greet and a photo. One of the last in line was the Review-Journal's director of advertising, Bob Brown, a hard-working Nevadan who toils every day on behalf of advertisers. He has nothing to do with news coverage or the opinion pages of the Review-Journal.

Yet, as Bob shook hands with our senior U.S. senator in what should have been nothing but a gracious business setting, Reid said: "I hope you go out of business."

Later, in his public speech, Reid said he wanted to let everyone know that he wants the Review-Journal to continue selling advertising because the Las Vegas Sun is delivered inside the Review-Journal.'

How collegial and senatorial of the Senate's Majority Leader.

Glen Thrush of Politico wonders (hopes) if Reid was engaging in some obscure dry humor, while The Washington Examiner wonders if the pressure of a tight election & falling poll numbers are getting to him. A separate paper, the Las Vegas Sun is privately and locally owned, and shares a joint distribution arrangement with the Las Vegas Review Journal. Wikepedia reports that the current and former editors are personal and political associates of the Clintons, both both papers appear to be publishing poor poll numbers and doubtful editorials about Sen. Reid, so the animosity is puzzling.

For whatever reason, Harry Reid seems to be straying further and further from the calm, even-tempered leader he projected (and that contrasted so directly with Nancy Pelosi). Perhaps this is Reid's real problem.

Nevada Senate - Lowden vs. Reid

Polling Data

PollDateSampleLowden (R)Reid (D)Spread
Mason-Dixon8/17 - 8/18400 RV4540Lowden +5

01 April 2009

Grade Obama's Performance

Here's your big chance to influence the MSM's cesspool otherwise known as MSNBC.

News widget by Feedzilla


RSS news feeds and News widgets

Buzz of the Day

Apture